Perbandingan Software SAP 2000 V.14 dan ETABS V.18 pada Analisa Struktur Gedung Serbaguna SM-TPI Klasis Pulau Ambon Utara Jemaat Wayame

Authors

  • Vector Johannes Universitas Kristen Indonesia Maluku
  • Thobyhend J.M Sahureka Universitas Kristen Indonesia Maluku
  • Joseph T. Tutuarima Universitas Kristen Indonesia Maluku

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51135/manumatav11i2p95-104

Keywords:

Prelliminary Design, SAP2000, ETABS, Structural Analysis, Earthquake-Resistant Design, Reinforcement

Abstract

Maluku, located at the convergence of three tectonic plates, is a seismically active region that requires earthquakeresistant building designs. This study analyzes and designs the structure of the multi-purpose building of SM-TPI Klasis Pulau Ambon Utara Jemaat Wayame, constructed on a 1,385 m² site with a building area of 848.7 m². The research process includes preliminary design, seismic load calculations using the equivalent static method (SNI 1726:2019), structural analysis with SAP2000 v.14 and ETABS v.18, and reinforcement design following SNI 2847:2019. Initially, the structure consisted of a 0.15 m floor slab, beams B1 (0.30 m x 0.60 m), beams B2 & BK (0.30 m x 0.40 m), beam BA (0.25 m x 0.30 m), columns K1 (0.40 m x 0.40 m), and K2 (0.30 m x 0.30 m). However, the structural analysis indicated failures, leading to an increase in dimensions: beam B1 (0.40 m x 0.70 m), beams B2 & BK (0.30 m x 0.50 m), beam BA (0.25 m x 0.40 m), column K1 (0.45 m x 0.45 m), and column K2 (0.40 m x 0.40 m). These changes resulted in higher seismic loads: W3 = 569.267 kN, W2 = 1,334.703 kN, and W1 = 826.171 kN. The reinforcement design was adjusted to meet performance standards. The floor slab uses Ø10-125 reinforcement. Beams B1 and B2 have top supports with 9D19 bars and bottom supports with 8D19 bars, along with shear reinforcement of 3D13-110 at supports and 2D13-140 in spans. Beams BK and BA use 3D19 bars at both ends with shear reinforcement of 2D13-110. Column K1 is reinforced with 20D19 main bars and 4D13-110 stirrups.

References

Afnaldi, A., & Dewi, S. (2022). Perencanaan Struktur

Atas Pembangunan Kantor Camat

Kecamatan Kinali Pasaman Barat Provinsi

Sumatera Barat. Ensiklopedia Research and

Community Service Review, 1(2).

http://jurnal.ensiklopediaku.org

Arini R N & Pradana, R. (2021). Analisa Tegangan

Regangan Pada Balok Dengan

Menggunakan Software Abaqus Cae V6. 14.

Jurnal Artesis, 1(2), 193-198.

Badan standardisasi nasional. (2019). Tata cara

perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk

struktur bangunan gedung dan nongedung

(sni 1726 : 2019). Jakarta: badan

standardisasi nasional

Badan standardisasi nasional. (2019). Tata cara

perhitungan struktur beton untuk bangunan

gedung (sni 2847 : 2019). Jakarta: badan

standardisasi nasional

Badan standardisasi nasional. (2020). Beban

minimum untuk perencanaan bangunan

gedung dan struktur lain (sni 1727 : 2020).

Jakarta: badan standardisasi nasional

Simatupang, P. H., Sir, T. M. W., & Wadu, V. A.

(2020). Integrasi Program Tekla

Structures Dan Sap2000 Dalam

Perencanaan Gedung Beton Struktural. In

Jurnal Teknik Sipil: Vol. IX (Issue 1).

Siswanto, A.B. , & Afif Salim, M. (2018). Kriteria

Dasar Perencanaan Struktur Bangunan

Tahan Gempa. Jurnal teknik sipil, 11, 59-

Syah, M.A. ., Zacky Ardhyan, M., Fajri, H.,

Purwandito, M., &I., (2023.). Jurnal

Ilmiah Rekayasa Sipil Perbandingan

Analisis Struktur Gedung Laboratorium

PGSD Universitas Samudra Metode

Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen Khusus

Menggunakan ETABS dan BIM Tekla

Struktural Designer. Edisi Oktober, 20(2),

http://ejournal2.pnp.ac.id/index.php/jirs/

Downloads

Published

2026-02-18