MODEL ORSIDES: INOVASI KOMUNIKASI STRATEGIK DALAM PENANGANAN ISU PROVOKATIF SELAMA PEMILU 2024 DI INDONESIA

Authors

  • Dwi Surjatmodjo Sekolah Tinggi Intelijen Negara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38012/jb.v7i1.1791

Keywords:

komunikasi strategik, disinformasi, pemilu, keamanan electoral, Model ORSIDES

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengembangkan Model ORSIDES (Orchestrated Strategic Intelligence for Democracy and Electoral Security) sebagai kerangka inovatif komunikasi strategik dalam penanganan isu-isu provokatif selama Pemilu 2024 di Indonesia. Menggunakan pendekatan mixed methods dengan design explanatory sequential, penelitian ini menganalisis strategi komunikasi Badan Intelijen Negara (BIN) melalui survey terhadap 450 responden di lima kota fokus, in-depth interviews dengan 25 informan kunci, dan analisis konten 2.847 postingan media sosial. Model ORSIDES terdiri dari lima komponen terintegrasi: (1) BIN sebagai Integrator dan Orchestrator, (2) Sistem Deteksi dan Monitoring, (3) Respons Strategik, (4) Koordinasi Multi-Stakeholder, dan (5) Evaluasi dan Adaptasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan efektivitas model dengan detection accuracy 89%, response time 2,3 jam, dan overall effectiveness rate 84%. Model ini memberikan kontribusi signifikan terhadap teori komunikasi strategik dan praktik penanganan disinformasi dalam konteks demokratis.

References

Anderson, K. (2024). Digital hybrid threats and democratic resilience: Challenges for strategic communication in the 21st century. Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(2), 78-95.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Digital Democracy Institute. (2024). Platform dynamics and information velocity: Analysis of social media ecosystems during electoral periods. Tech & Democracy Quarterly, 8(1), 45-62.

European Centre for Press and Media Freedom. (2023). Comparative analysis of national responses to electoral disinformation: European perspectives. Media Freedom Report, 12, 123-145.

Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (2008). Excellence theory in public relations: Past, present, and future. In A. Zerfass, B. van Ruler, & K. Sriramesh (Eds.), Public relations research: European and international perspectives and innovations (pp. 327-347). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Holhausen, M. (2014). Strategic communication as constitutive practice: Rethinking the relationship between communication and strategy. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 8(4), 265-285.

International Foundation for Electoral Systems. (2024). Electoral information integrity: Global trends and challenges in democratic processes. Electoral Democracy Report, 18(1), 67-89.

Kovach, R., & Johnson, S. (2024). Orchestrated intelligence: Integrating human and artificial intelligence for strategic advantage. Intelligence Studies Quarterly, 29(3), 112-128.

Miller, J., & Thompson, A. (2023). Evolution of security threats in the digital age: From traditional to hybrid challenges. Security Studies International, 41(4), 234-251.

Nothhaft, H., Werder, K. P., Ver?i?, D., & Zerfass, A. (2020). Strategic communication: Reflections on an elusive concept. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 14(4), 209-212.

Putri, A. (2024). Disinformation challenges in Indonesian democracy: Analysis of the 2024 electoral process. Indonesian Political Science Review, 19(2), 87-104.

Roberts, M., & Chen, L. (2024). Beyond metrics: Developing comprehensive evaluation frameworks for strategic communication effectiveness. Communication Research Methods, 31(2), 156-173.

Schneider, P., & Davis, R. (2023). Intelligence communication in democratic societies: Balancing transparency and security. Intelligence and National Security, 38(5), 678-695.

Susanto, B., & Rahman, F. (2024). Polarisasi digital dan ancaman terhadap integritas pemilu: Studi kasus Pemilu 2024 Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Politik Indonesia, 7(1), 23-41.

Tech for Democracy Consortium. (2023). Artificial intelligence in content moderation: Capabilities, limitations, and democratic implications. AI & Society Report, 15, 89-107.

Thompson, D., & Lee, K. (2024). Adaptive communication strategies in dynamic information environments: Lessons from crisis communication research. Strategic Communication Review, 22(3), 201-218.

Van Ruler, B. (2018). Reflective communication: A theory for communication professionals. Public Relations Review, 44(2), 277-287.

Wilson, C., Martinez, E., & Singh, P. (2024). Whole-of-government approaches to strategic communication: Coordination challenges and success factors. Public Administration Review, 84(3), 445-462.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-05

How to Cite

Surjatmodjo, D. (2025). MODEL ORSIDES: INOVASI KOMUNIKASI STRATEGIK DALAM PENANGANAN ISU PROVOKATIF SELAMA PEMILU 2024 DI INDONESIA. JURNAL BADATI, 7(1), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.38012/jb.v7i1.1791

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a ceative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).