MODEL INOVASI PELAYANAN PUBLIK BERBASIS KOLABORASI PENTAHELIX DALAM MENINGKATKAN DAYA SAING DAERAH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38012/jb.v6i2.1351Keywords:
Pentahelix Collaboratio, Public Service Innovation, Regional Competitiveness, Smart Governance, Systematic ReviewAbstract
This research examines the development of public service innovation models based on pentahelix collaboration in enhancing regional competitiveness through a systematic literature review approach. The analysis was conducted on 127 peer-reviewed articles published between 2018- 2024, using the PRISMA framework and SPIDER analysis model. The results show that pentahelix collaboration implementation has a significant impact on improving public service quality, with an implementation success rate of 78%. Critical factors influencing implementation success include leadership support (92%), shared vision (85%), and communication effectiveness (88%). Model implementation resulted in service time reduction by 45%, operational cost reduction by 32%, and public satisfaction index increase by 28%. The developed implementation framework encompasses four main dimensions: structural, process, technology, and social, with a phased approach including initiation, development, and implementation. Major implementation challenges were identified in aspects of overlapping authority, digital infrastructure gaps, and resistance to change. The research provides strategic recommendations for each pentahelix stakeholder to optimize their roles and contributions in enhancing regional competitiveness through public service innovation.
References
Ahmad, K., & Hasan, R. (2023). Public Service Innovation through Pentahelix Collaboration: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 15(2), 78-95.
Anderson, K., & Wilson, J. (2023). Change Management in Public Service Innovation: A Systematic Review. Public Management Review, 25(3), 312-330.
Carayannis, E., et al. (2021). The Evolution of Triple Helix to Pentahelix Model in Public Service Innovation. Technovation, 108, 102337.
Chen, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). Adaptive Public Service Models in the Era of Disruption: A Pentahelix Approach. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 36(1), 12-28.
Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435- 1443.
Davidson, R. (2022). Contextual Innovation in Public Services: A Regional Perspective. Regional Studies, 56(4), 567-582.
Gonzalez, M., et al. (2022). Performance Measurement in Collaborative Public Services. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(2), 234-256. Halibas, A., et al. (2022). Pentahelix Collaboration Model: Stakeholder Roles and
Contributions. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(8), 678-695. Harris, L., et al. (2022). Managing Change in Public Service Transformation. Public
Organization Review, 22(1), 45-62.
Johnson, P., & Smith, T. (2023). Sustainability Framework for Public Service
Innovation. Sustainable Development, 31(2), 289-304.
Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2022). Integrated Public Service System through Pentahelix
Collaboration: Lessons from South Korea. Public Administration Review,
(3), 445-460.
Kumar, R., et al. (2023). Smart Governance and Public Service Excellence. Government
Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101731.
Martinez, C., & Rodriguez, S. (2023). Digital Transformation in OECD Public Services.
International Journal of Public Sector Management, 36(2), 178-196.
Mitchell, B., & Taylor, S. (2023). Performance Measurement Framework for Collaborative Public Services. Public Administration Quarterly, 47(1), 89-112. Nicholas, J., et al. (2022). Sustainable Public Services: Balancing Multiple Objectives.
Sustainability, 14(4), 2156.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C.
D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline
for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372.
Park, S., & Lee, J. (2022). Smart Governance Implementation: Organizational Culture
Perspective. Information Polity, 27(1), 45-62.
Putra, A., & Santoso, B. (2023). Framework for Effective Pentahelix Collaboration in
Public Service Innovation. Government Innovation Journal, 8(1), 34-52. Rahman, M. (2023). Digital Transformation in Public Service: The Role of Pentahelix
Collaboration. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 4(2), 1-18. Richardson, M., & Brown, K. (2022). Success Factors in Multi-stakeholder Collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(2),
-284.
Samsara, L., & Pratama, A. B. (2021). Evaluating Public Service Innovation in
Indonesia: A Pentahelix Perspective. Policy & Governance Review, 5(2), 123- 142.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
Thompson, N., et al. (2022). Digital Transformation Challenges in Public Services. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 3(1), 1-18.
Widodo, S., et al. (2021). Resource Sharing and Knowledge Transfer in Pentahelix Collaboration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(4), 890-908.
Wijaya, A., et al. (2022). Measuring Public Satisfaction in Indonesian Cities: The Impact of Pentahelix Collaboration. Asian Public Administration Review, 30(1), 67-85.
World Economic Forum. (2023). Global Competitiveness Report 2023. WEF Publication.
Yang, L., & Liu, H. (2023). Public Service Innovation and Regional Competitiveness. Regional Studies, 57(5), 789-804.
Yunas, N. S. (2019). Implementasi Konsep Penta Helix dalam Pengembangan Potensi Desa melalui Model Lumbung Ekonomi Desa di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Matra Pembaruan, 3(1), 37-46.
Zhang, X., et al. (2023). Multi-stakeholder Collaboration in Public Services: Key Success Factors. Public Management Review, 25(1), 56-75.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a ceative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
